[Ann Kasten]

Nice catch! I made a note on my copy for discussion.

One of the sections that is confusing to me is how the quorum section 2.06 is defined for member meetings.

The ‘current’ Bylaws Section 5, in my opinion clearly defines it as a minimum of 15 paid WTA members. Which is easy to identify by a glance at those in attendance.

The ‘proposed’ to me has a much broader set of criteria, that I’m not so sure is realistic to expect, followed by what appears to be guidance on how to work around that. Kinda murky to me.

To add to my confusion, is the leading line which references …except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Inc…

Hope to be less confused about this and a couple other items after the meeting tomorrow!

ATK

 

[Ann Kasten]

Re-typing..I see my copy and paste included all the HTML stuff and I’m not sure how to delete a post.

Would it be possible to post the Articles of Incorporation? I’ve come across several references to these in the Bylaws and am trying to make the respective cross references.

Thank you.

ATK

 

[Ann Kasten]

Figured out how to edit, but only after I had posted (original had all sorts of HTML tags etc)

Working on getting get smarten’d up on how this forum works.

Please see my re-typed post for my request. ATK

• This reply was modified 9 years, 12 months ago by Ann Kasten.

[Author]

Posts